Blog

The Pros and Cons of Hiring Independent Contractors

fireworks-1758_640As Independence Day nears, we look at the meaning of what independence meant for our country in 1776. On that day, The Continental Congress declared that the thirteen American colonies were no longer subject (and subordinate) to the monarch of Britain and were now united, free, and independent states. 

Much like our founding fathers, independent contractors like to maintain their sense of freedom. They can pick and choose what they work on, when they want to work on it. They aren't tied down to a company they don't want to work with, much like we didn't want to be tied to the British Monarch.

As of 2018, independent contractors made up approximately 10.1 percent of the United States workforce. This means that about every one in ten workers is independently working, so demand is relatively high for this particular type of workforce.

However, deciding whether to hire a full-time employee or an independent contractor is no easy decision. There are beneficial and detrimental factors surrounding each alternative. Here are some of the major pros and cons of hiring an independent contractor.

 

Pros of Hiring Independent Contractors

 

Saving Money

In most cases, hiring an independent contractor is cheaper to the organization than hiring a full-time employee. With an independent contractor, the employer does not have to pay for the worker’s comp insurance, unemployment insurance, health insurance, Medicare, or Social Security. Companies also do not have to provide paid time off, nor incur training expenses. Independent contractors typically make more money on an hourly basis, but due to all the expenses, employers are not required to spend on independent contractors, they still usually end up saving companies money in the end.

 

Expertise

Often, when a company chooses to hire independent contractors, they are only hired to complete a particular project. Because of this, contractors are used to doing the same type of work all the time, allowing them to become experts in a given field. Their expertise makes them highly efficient workers compared to a full-time employee who most likely has many job duties to keep up with. With independent contractors, their work is likely to be top of the line due to the repetitive nature of their prior experience.

 

Risk of Lawsuits Decreased

The government grants full-time employees many rights and protections that employers are required to abide by. Employers are not required to grant independent contractors this same level of rights and protections, so employers reduce their exposure to lawsuits by hiring them. For example, some companies occasionally have to battle wrongful termination suits, but these suits are not a factor with hiring independent contractors due to the lessened regulations regarding their employment. 

 


Click here to download an eBook full of expert tips on how to develop a game plan to safely and effectively manage contract labor.


 

Cons of Hiring Independent Contractors

 

Lack of Authority/Control

Employers do not hold the same level of authority and control over independent contractors as they do over their full-time employees. Since contractors are used to the independent nature of their jobs, they typically perform tasks in whatever way they know personally works best for them. If a temporary employer has a specific request, contractors will most likely accommodate them while still working in a predominately autonomous fashion. They are essentially their own boss, so a mutual understanding should exist between the employer and the contractor that contractors will expect some freedom in performing their duties. If an employer is someone who seeks full control over all their workers and projects, then hiring independent contractors would not work out best for them.

 

Quality of Work

Since independent contractors are usually just hired to complete one project for a company, there is a chance that they will not put forth their best effort. They may make sure they complete the task and not worry about it being the best work they can do because they will never have to work for that employer again. Because of this, a full-time employee might do a better job than a contractor because they want to make a positive long-term impression on their employer. With that being said, the majority of independent contractors will do a great job completing a given task, but the potential risk is worth mentioning. 

 

Copyrighted Work

When a contractor makes something that can be copyrighted while they are working for an employer, the contractor technically owns that copyright. Unless it is stated otherwise in a contract, the company will not own the copyright to the contractor's work. If an employer is looking to hire someone for a very important project that they want to own after completion, then an independent contractor would not be the most strategic choice for them. Employers and contractors both need to be cautious when they sign a hiring contract. 

 

Conclusion

Every company is different, so there is no set formula to determine which staffing model is best for each one. There is both advantages and disadvantages to hiring full-time employees or independent contractors, so finding the best solution for any company needs to be evaluated on an individual basis.

Subscribe_to_Yoh_Blogs

Related Posts

FedEx tries to quit, should you? (Part 1 of 2) Read Post Independent contractor lessons from New York State Read Post IC Roads: Driving Independent Contractor Compliance Read Post